4.4 Article

Optical constants of anodic aluminum oxide films formed in oxalic acid solution

Journal

THIN SOLID FILMS
Volume 516, Issue 21, Pages 7689-7694

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2008.03.023

Keywords

anodic aluminum oxide films (AAO); optical constants; Wemple-DiDomenico model; dispersion parameters

Funding

  1. Foundation of National Natural Science, China [10774121]
  2. Foundation of Northwest Normal University, Gansu Province, China [NWNU-KJCXGC-03-22]
  3. Youth Teacher Foundation of Northwest Normal University, Gansu Province, China [NWNU-QN-06-25]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) films with highly ordered nanopore arrays were prepared in oxalic acid solution under different anodizing voltage and time, its surface and cross section appearances were characterized by using field emission scanning electron microscopy, the transmission spectra with the interference fringes were measured at normal incidence over the wavelength range 200 to 2500 rim. Then the modified Swanepoel method was used for the determination of the optical constants and thickness of the free standing AAO films. The results indicate that the refractive index increases with the increase of anodizing voltage and the decrease of anodizing time, which is mainly due to the content of Al(2)O3 with octahedron increases in the AAO films. The dispersion of the refractive index is discussed in terms of the single-oscillator Wemple-DiDomenico model, and the energy dependence of the absorption coefficient can be described using the direct transition model proposed by Tauc. Likewise, the optical energy gap E-g is derived from Tauc's extrapolation, and E-g increases from 4.178 to 4.256 eV with the anodizing voltage, but is weakly dependent on anodizing time. All the results are self-consistent in the paper. (c) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available