4.5 Article

Effect of HA with different grain size range on the crystallization behaviors and mechanical property of HA/PLGA composite

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 565, Issue -, Pages 52-57

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.05.004

Keywords

Composites; Isothermal crystallization; Mechanical properties; Differential scanning calorimeter (DSC)

Funding

  1. Talent Training Project of West Light Foundation of Chinese Academy of Science
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31000440]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The crystallization behaviors and mechanical properties of pure PLGA and the two HA/PLGA composites containing 3 wt% surface-modified HA with grain sizes of less than 0.65 mu m and 2 mu m were investigated by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC), a polarized optical microscopy (POM) and electromechanical universal tester. The crystallization behaviors, isothermal crystallization kinetics analysis and spherulite growth procession observation showed that the morphology of spherulite had no remarkable difference among the three samples. However, the crystallization rate of the HA/PLGA composite with the larger grain size range HA was the fastest, and the bending and tensile strength results showed its mechanical property was also greatly enhanced comparing with the HA/PLGA composite with the smaller grain size range HA and pure PLGA. The above results suggested that the larger grain size range HA, acting as a more effective heterogeneous nucleating agent in HA/PLGA composite, was more benefit to promote the crystallization of PLGA and result in a higher mechanical property of HA/PLGA composites than the small grain size range HA, which would be of guiding significance to select size range of other inorganic particles to improve the mechanical property of PLA or PLGA-based composites in future. (c) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available