4.5 Article

Non-isothermal decomposition behavior of Fluorel bonded explosives containing attractive cyclic nitramines

Journal

THERMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 574, Issue -, Pages 10-18

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tca.2013.09.036

Keywords

PBX; Cyclic nitramines; Thermal decomposition; Kinetic parameters; Fluoropolymer

Funding

  1. Ministry of Interior of the Czech Republic [VG20102014032]
  2. Ministry of Education, Youth & Sports of the Czech Republic [MSM00221627501]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The thermal behavior and decomposition kinetics of Fluorel-bonded PBXs based on some attractive cyclic nitramines were explored by means of non-isothermal TG and DSC techniques. The exothermic onset temperatures on DSC curves of RDX-FL, BCHMX-FL, HMX-FL and CL-20-FL were noticed at 208.7, 235.6, 277.2 and 239.2 degrees C with the peak maximum of 233.8, 237.4, 278.8 and 239.5 degrees C, respectively. The corresponding heat releases are 1758, 1393, 1546 and 1893 J g(-1), which are much lower than that of the pure cyclic nitramines. According to DSC peak shift, similar to Viton A, Fluorel polymer is probably not chemically compatible with BCHMX resulting in much lower thermal stability and heat of decomposition compared with pure BCHMX. It is also proved that Both Fluorel and Viton A could decrease or inhibit the autocatalytic effect occurring during liquid-state decomposition of RDX. However, opposite to Viton A, the Fluorel polymer could enhance the autocatalytic effect of BCHMX due to bad chemical compatibility. The activation energies for thermolysis of RDX-FL and CL-20-FL are found almost independent on the conversion rate (0.3 < alpha < 0.7) with the mean values of 170 +/- 3, and 206 +/- 3 kJ mol(-1), while those of BCHMX-FL and HMX-FL are largely dependent on the conversion rate with average values of 189 +/- 4 and 117 +/- 5 kJ mol(-1). (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available