4.5 Article

Impact response and damage evolution of triaxial braided carbon/epoxy composites. Part I: Ballistic impact testing

Journal

TEXTILE RESEARCH JOURNAL
Volume 83, Issue 16, Pages 1703-1716

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0040517512474363

Keywords

Triaxial braid; containment fan case; ballistic impact; damage evolution; analytical model

Funding

  1. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120101110065]
  2. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [Y1090245]
  3. Aeronautical Foundation of China [20095276009]
  4. Opening Foundation of State Key laboratory of Explosion Science and Technology of China [KFJJ10-9M]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To investigate the high-velocity impact response and damage evolution of the triaxial braided composite fan case, a series of ballistic impact tests using blade-like projectiles were conducted. Cylindrical projectiles of the same cross-section perimeter were also employed to identify the influence of projectile geometry. In addition, satin woven composites were tested for comparison with respect to failure modes and damage shape. Experimental results indicate that the main failure modes for the two different fiber reinforcement architectures are similar, that is, fiber shear failure and matrix crush failure in the impact surface and fiber tensile failure, fiber pull-out, matrix cracking, and delamination in the exit surface. The damage area in the exit surface is diamond-shaped for satin woven composites while rounded or elliptic for triaxial braided composites according to projectile geometry. The triaxial braided composites have an improved ballistic resistance and higher ballistic limit than satin woven composites. Based on damage area and failure modes observed from experiments, ballistic behavior was predicted using an analytical model, which proves to be accurate enough.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available