4.5 Article

Moho depth variations in the Taiwan orogen from joint inversion of seismic arrival time and Bouguer gravity data

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 632, Issue -, Pages 151-159

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2014.06.009

Keywords

Tomography; Joint inversion; Seismic arrival time; Bouguer gravity anomaly; Subduction; Continental crust

Funding

  1. NSF Grant [EAR-1010580]
  2. KMA, Research Development Program [CATER 2014-5030]
  3. [NSFC41210005]
  4. [NSFC41304045]
  5. [XDB06030203]
  6. [SKLGED2013-9-3-Z]
  7. Directorate For Geosciences
  8. Division Of Earth Sciences [1010580] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The joint inversion of different geophysical datasets is an effective means to reduce the non-uniqueness and improve the reliability of geophysical inversion. In this study, seismic arrival time and Bouguer gravity datasets are jointly inverted to obtain an image of 3-D velocity structures in the Taiwan orogen. The model obtained from joint inversion fits the arrival time observations at least as well as when inverted individually, and the gravity observations are much better fit when included in the inversion, implying a reduction in ambiguity by simultaneously modeling the disparate datasets. Moho depth variations estimated by the 3-D P wave velocity model suggest a maximum Moho depth of 56 km located beneath the Backbone Central Range, and the trend of the Moho is largely consistent with the topography of the Central Range with eastward, asymmetric crustal thickening. The root beneath the Central Range appears to be smaller in lateral extent than previously imaged, and the velocity gradients into the uppermost mantle are significantly higher. The lack of evidence for a significant amount of Eurasian crust in the mantle supports geodynamical models of accreted, rather than consumed, continental crust in a collisional environment. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available