4.5 Article

Seismological constraints on the collision belt between the North and South China blocks in the Yellow Sea

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 570, Issue -, Pages 102-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2012.08.034

Keywords

Yellow Sea; Paleo-collision belt; Focal mechanism; Ambient stress field; Lithospheric delamination

Funding

  1. Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program [CATER 2012-8050]
  2. Korea Meteorological Administration [CATER-2012-8050] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Korean Peninsula, eastern China and the Yellow Sea comprise the eastern Eurasian plate, and are believed to share considerable tectonic evolution history. The tectonic structures in the Yellow Sea are poorly understood, raising difficulty in reconstruction of tectonic evolution history in the eastern Eurasian plate. The tectonic structures in the Yellow Sea are constrained by seismicity and fault-plane solutions of earthquakes. The fault-plane solutions are determined by waveform inversions and seismic phase polarity analyses. The ambient stress fields are deduced from the fault-plane solutions. The primary stress field around the Yellow Sea is composed of ENE-WSW directional compression and NNW-SSE directional tension. Normal-faulting earthquakes with ENE-WSW directional strikes are observed in the central Yellow Sea between the Shandong Peninsula and the central Korean Peninsula. The normal-faulting region is interpreted to be a northern margin of collision belt between the North and South China blocks. The normal-faulting system suggests post-collisional lithospheric delamination, causing reverse activation of paleo-thrustal faults that were developed by the collision between the North and South China blocks in the early Jurassic period. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available