4.5 Article

Radiogenic heat production variability of some common lithological groups and its significance to lithospheric thermal modeling

Journal

TECTONOPHYSICS
Volume 490, Issue 3-4, Pages 152-164

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2010.05.003

Keywords

Radiogenic heat production; Geothermal modeling; Heat flow; Lithosphere; Continental crust

Funding

  1. TopoMed-Spain [CGL2008-03474-E/BTE]
  2. ATIZA [CGL2009-09662/BTE]
  3. Consolider-Ingenio 2010 Topo-Iberia [CSD2006-00041]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Determining the temperature distribution within the lithosphere requires the knowledge of the radiogenic heat production (RHP) distribution within the crust and the lithospheric mantle. RHP of crustal rocks varies considerably at different scales as a result of the petrogenetic processes responsible for their formation and therefore RHP depends on the considered lithologies. In this work we address RHP variability of some common lithological groups from a compilation of a total of 2188 representative U, Th and K concentrations of different worldwide rock types derived from 102 published studies. To optimize the use of the generated RHP database we have classified and renamed the rock-type denominations of the original works following a petrologic classification scheme with a hierarchical structure. The RHP data of each lithological group is presented in cumulative distribution plots, and we report a table with the mean, the standard deviation, the minimum and maximum values, and the significant percentiles of these lithological groups. We discuss the reported RHP distribution for the different igneous, sedimentary and metamorphic lithological groups from a petrogenetic viewpoint and give some useful guidelines to assign RHP values to lithospheric thermal modeling. Crown Copyright (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available