4.3 Article

Characterization of La/Fe/TiO2 and Its Photocatalytic Performance in Ammonia Nitrogen Wastewater

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph121114626

Keywords

characterization; photocatalysis; La; Fe; TiO2; ammonia nitrogen wastewater

Funding

  1. Twelfth five-year national science and technology support programme [2012 BAC11b07]
  2. ministry of education [NCET-10-0183]
  3. National natural science foundation of China [51408277]
  4. Jiangxi province talent project 555 Talents training plan
  5. Major disciplines in Jiangxi province and technology leaders to develop a target projects [2010 DD01200]
  6. Jiangxi province natural science fund project [20122 BAB203027]
  7. Jiangxi Students' innovation and entrepreneurship training program [201410407022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

La/Fe/TiO2 composite photocatalysts were synthesized by Sol-Gel method and well characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), nitrogen-physical adsorption, and UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra (UV-Vis DRS). It is interesting that the doped catalysts were in anatase phase while the pure TiO2 was in rutile phase. In addition, the composites possessed better physical chemical properties in photocatalytic activity than pure TiO2: stronger visible-light-response ability, larger specific surface area, and more regular shape in morphology. The photodegradation results of ammonia nitrogen indicate that: the La/Fe/TiO2 had higher catalytic activity to ammonia nitrogen waste water compared pure TiO2 and the other single metal-doped TiO2. pH 10 and 2 mmol/L H2O2 were all beneficial to the removal of ammonia nitrogen by La/Fe/TiO2. However, the common inorganic ions of Cl-, NO3-, SO42-, HCO3-/CO32-, Na+, K+, Ca2+ and Mg2+ in water all inhibited the degradation of ammonia nitrogen. By balance calculation, at least 20% of ammonia nitrogen was converted to N-2 during the 64.6% removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available