4.7 Article

Screening analysis of beer ageing using near infrared spectroscopy and the Successive Projections Algorithm for variable selection

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 286-291

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2011.12.030

Keywords

Beer; Ageing; Near infrared spectroscopy; Wavelength selection; Classification; Successive Projections Algorithm; Linear Discriminant Analysis

Funding

  1. Iran National Science Foundation (INSF)
  2. Spanish Ministry of Science [AGL2009-12660/ALI]
  3. CNPq
  4. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work proposes a method for monitoring the ageing of beer using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy and chemometrics classification tools. For this purpose, the Successive Projections Algorithm (SPA) is used to select spectral variables for construction of Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) classification models. A total of 83 alcoholic and non-alcoholic beer samples packaged in bottles and cans were examined. To simulate a long storage period, some of the samples were stored in an oven at 40 degrees C, in the dark, during intervals of 10 and 20 days. The NIR spectrum of these samples in the range 12,500-5405 cm(-1) was then compared against those of the fresh samples. The results of a Principal Component Analysis (PCA) indicated that the alcoholic beer samples could be clearly discriminated with respect to ageing stage (fresh, 10-day or 20-day forced ageing). However, such discrimination was not apparent for the nonalcoholic samples. These findings were corroborated by a classification study using Soft Independent Modelling of Class Analogy (SIMCA). In contrast, the use of SPA-LDA provided good results for both types of beer (only one misclassified sample) by using a single wavenumber in each case, namely 5550 cm(-1) for non-alcoholic samples and 7228 cm(-1) for alcoholic samples. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available