4.7 Article

Development of a fast and efficient ultrasonic-based strategy for DNA fragmentation

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 881-886

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.01.032

Keywords

Ultrasound; Sonoreactor; DNA fragmental ion; Sample preparation; Restriction enzyme

Funding

  1. FCT/MCTES [PTDC/BIO/66514/2006, PTDC/SAU-BEB/66511/2006]
  2. CIGMH [SRFH/BD/38509/2007, SFRH/BD/64026/2009, SFRH/BDE/15544/2005]
  3. Xunta de Galicia (Spain)
  4. Universidade de Vigo (Spain) [2009-INOU-15]
  5. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/BIO/66514/2006, PTDC/SAU-BEB/66511/2006] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several ultrasound-based platforms for DNA sample preparation were evaluated in terms of effective fragmentation of DNA (plasmid and genomic DNA) ultrasonic probe, sonoreactor, ultrasonic bath and the newest Vialtweeter device. The sonoreactor showed the best efficiency of DNA fragmentation while simultaneously assuring no cross-contamination of samples, and was considered the best ultrasonic tool to achieve effective fragmentation of DNA at high-throughput and avoid sample overheating. Several operation variables were studied ultrasonication time and amplitude. DNA concentration, sample volume and sample pre-treatment that allowed optimisation of a sonoreactor-based strategy for effective DNA fragmentation. Optimal operating conditions to achieve DNA fragmentation were set to 100% ultrasonic amplitude, 100 mu L sample volume, 8 min ultrasonic treatment (2 min/sample) for a DNA concentration of 100 mu g mL(-1). The proposed ultrasonication strategy can be easily implemented in any laboratory setup, providing fast, simple and reliable means for effective DNA sample preparation when fragmentation is critical for downstream molecular detection and diagnostics protocols. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available