4.7 Article

Speciation of inorganic arsenic in a sequential injection dual mini-column system coupled with hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages 88-93

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2008.10.060

Keywords

Arsenic speciation; Sequential injection; Dual mini-column; C18; 717 anion exchange resin; Hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [20575010, 20635010]
  2. National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars [20725517]
  3. Major International Joint Research [20821120292]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The separation and speciation of inorganic arsenic(III) and arsenic(V) are facilitated by employing a novel sequential injection system incorporating two mini-columns followed by detection with hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry. An octadecyl immobilized silica mini-column is used for selective retention of the complex between As(III) and APDC, while the sorption of As(V) is readily accomplished by a 717 anion exchange resin mini-column. The retained As(III)-PDC complex and As(V) are effectively eluted with a 3.0 mol L-1 hydrochloric acid solution as stripping reagent, which well facilitates the ensuing hydride generation process via reaction with tetra hydroborate. With a sampling volume of 1.0 mL and an eluent volume of 100 mu L for both species, linear ranges of 0.05-1.5 mu g L-1 for As(III) and 0.1-1.5 mu g L-1 for As(V) are obtained, along with enrichment factors of 7.0 and 8.2, respectively. Precisions of 2.8% for As(III) and 2.9% for As(V) are derived at the concentration level of 1.0 mu g L-1. The practical applicability of the procedure has been demonstrated by analyzing a certified reference material of riverine water (SLRS-4), in addition to spiking recovery in a lake water sample matrix. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available