4.7 Article

Evaluation of tungsten coil electrothermal vaporization-Ar/H2 flame atomic fluorescence spectrometry for determination of eight traditional hydride-forming elements and cadmium without chemical vapor generation

Journal

TALANTA
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 505-511

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2007.06.013

Keywords

tungsten coil; electrothermal vaporization; atomic fluorescence spectrometry; hydride; flame atomization; cadmium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A tungsten coil electrothermal vaporizer (W-coil ETV) was coupled to an Ar/H-2 flame atomic fluorescence spectrometer for the determination of eight traditional hydride-forming elements (i.e., As, Bi, Ge, Pb, Sb, Se, Sn, and Te) as well as cadmium without chemical vapor generation. A small sample volume, typically 20 mu L, was manually pipetted onto the W-coil and followed by a fixed electric heating program. During the vaporization step, analyte was vaporized off the coil surface and swept into the quartz tube atomizer of AFS for further atomization and excitation of atomic fluorescence by a flow of Ar/H-2 gas, which was ignited to produce the Ar/H-2 flame. The tungsten coil electrothermal vaporizer and Ar/H-2 flame formed a tandem atomizer to produce reliable atomic fluorescence signals. Under the optimal instrumental conditions, limits of detection (LODs) were found to be better than those by flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) or inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES) for all the nine elements investigated. The absolute LODs are better or equivalent to those by hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectrometry (HG-AFS). Possible scattering interferences were studied and preliminary application of the proposed method was also reported. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available