4.3 Article

Evaluation of the effectiveness of semen storage and sperm purification methods for spermatozoa transcript profiling

Journal

SYSTEMS BIOLOGY IN REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE
Volume 59, Issue 5, Pages 287-295

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.3109/19396368.2013.817626

Keywords

mitochondrial RNA; preferentially isolated transcripts; stable transcript pairs

Funding

  1. Charlotte B. Failing Professorship
  2. Harvard School of Public Health
  3. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences [ES017285]
  4. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [25PM6]
  5. LIFE Study Working Group, Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different semen storage and sperm purification methods may affect the integrity of isolated spermatozoa! RNA. RNA-Seq was applied to determine whether semen storage methods (pelleted vs. liquefied) and somatic cell lysis buffer (SCLB) vs. PureSperm (PS) purification methods affect the quantity and quality of sperm RNA. The results indicate that the method of semen storage does not markedly impact RNA profiling whereas the choice of purification can yield significant differences. RNA-Seq showed that the majority of mitochondrial and mid-piece associated transcripts were lost after SCLB purification, which indicated that the mid-piece of spermatozoa may have been compromised. In addition, the number of stable transcript pairs from SCLB-samples was less than that from the PS samples. This study supports the view that PS purification better maintains the integrity of spermatozoal RNAs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available