4.5 Article

Consensus tracking for higher-order multi-agent systems with switching directed topologies and occasionally missing control inputs

Journal

SYSTEMS & CONTROL LETTERS
Volume 62, Issue 12, Pages 1151-1158

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2013.09.009

Keywords

Higher-order multi-agent system; Consensus tracking; Switching directed topology; Missing control input

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61304168, 61104145, 61322302, 61272530]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20130595, BK2011581]
  3. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110092120024]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China
  5. Hong Kong Research Grants Council under the GRF Grant [CityU 1109/12]
  6. Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University [3-130/1434/HiCi]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper studies the distributed consensus tracking problem of linear higher-order multi-agent systems with switching directed topologies and occasionally missing control inputs. In this framework, the underlying topology of dynamic agents may switch among several directed graphs, each having a directed spanning tree rooted at the leader. Furthermore, the control inputs to the followers may be temporally missed due to actuator failures and network-induced packet loss. To guarantee asymptotic consensus tracking in such a multi-agent system, several distributed controllers are constructed based only on the relative state information of neighboring agents. By appropriately constructing a switching Lyapunov function and using tools from the M-matrix theory, some sufficient conditions for achieving distributed consensus tracking are provided. Finally, some numerical simulations are given to illustrate the theoretical analysis. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available