4.6 Article

Predicting hurricane wind damage by claim payout based on Hurricane Ike in Texas

Journal

GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK
Volume 7, Issue 5, Pages 1513-1525

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19475705.2015.1084540

Keywords

Risk; hurricanes; GIS

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning [2014R1A1A1004288]
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014R1A1A1004288] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing occurrence of natural disasters and their related damage have led to a growing demand for models that predict financial loss. Although considerable research on the financial losses related to natural disasters has found significant predictors, there has been a lack of comprehensive study that addresses the relationship among vulnerabilities, natural disasters, and the economic losses of individual buildings. This study identifies the vulnerability indicators for hurricanes to establish a metric to predict the related financial loss. We classify hurricane-prone areas by highlighting the spatial distribution of losses and vulnerabilities. This study used a Geographical Information System (GIS) to combine and produce spatial data and a multiple regression method to establish a wind damage prediction model. As the dependent variable, we used the value of the Texas Windstorm Insurance Association (TWIA) claim payout divided by the appraised values of the buildings to predict real economic loss. As independent variables, we selected a hurricane indicator and built environment vulnerability indicators. The model we developed can be used by government agencies and insurance companies to predict hurricane wind damage.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available