Minimal models and canonical neural computations: the distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Minimal models and canonical neural computations: the distinctness of computational explanation in neuroscience
Authors
Keywords
Neuroscience, Mechanism, Biology, Computation , Explanation
Journal
SYNTHESE
Volume 191, Issue 2, Pages 127-153
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2013-11-26
DOI
10.1007/s11229-013-0369-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Efficient Coding of Spatial Information in the Primate Retina
- (2012) E. Doi et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- Computation, San Diego Style
- (2012) Oron Shagrir PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Inaugurating Understanding or Repackaging Explanation?*
- (2012) Kareem Khalifa PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Contrast normalization contributes to a biologically-plausible model of receptive-field development in primary visual cortex (V1)
- (2012) Ben D.B. Willmore et al. VISION RESEARCH
- The Functional Unity of Special Science Kinds
- (2011) D. A. Weiskopf BRITISH JOURNAL FOR THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Reconstructing Visual Experiences from Brain Activity Evoked by Natural Movies
- (2011) Shinji Nishimoto et al. CURRENT BIOLOGY
- The Explanatory Force of Dynamical and Mathematical Models in Neuroscience: A Mechanistic Perspective*
- (2011) David Michael Kaplan et al. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Explanation and description in computational neuroscience
- (2011) David Michael Kaplan SYNTHESE
- Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches
- (2011) Gualtiero Piccinini et al. SYNTHESE
- Models and mechanisms in psychological explanation
- (2011) Daniel A. Weiskopf SYNTHESE
- Neural reuse: A fundamental organizational principle of the brain
- (2010) Michael L. Anderson BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
- Divisive Normalization in Olfactory Population Codes
- (2010) Shawn R. Olsen et al. NEURON
- Marr on Computational-Level Theories*
- (2010) Oron Shagrir PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Magnitude of Perceived Change in Natural Images May Be Linearly Proportional to Differences in Neuronal Firing Rates
- (2010) David Tolhurst et al. Seeing and Perceiving
- Computation vs. information processing: why their difference matters to cognitive science
- (2010) Gualtiero Piccinini et al. STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Equal numbers of neuronal and nonneuronal cells make the human brain an isometrically scaled-up primate brain
- (2009) Frederico A.C. Azevedo et al. JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY
- The Hodgkin‐Huxley Equations and the Concrete Model: Comments on Craver, Schaffner, and Weber
- (2009) Jim Bogen PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Theories, Models, and Equations in Biology: The Heuristic Search for Emergent Simplifications in Neurobiology
- (2009) Kenneth F. Schaffner PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Causes without Mechanisms: Experimental Regularities, Physical Laws, and Neuroscientific Explanation
- (2009) Marcel Weber PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Physical Law and Mechanistic Explanation in the Hodgkin and Huxley Model of the Action Potential
- (2009) Carl F. Craver PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Predictable irregularities in retinal receptive fields
- (2009) Y. S. Liu et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Design of a Neuronal Array
- (2008) B. G. Borghuis et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- So Many Choices: What Computational Models Reveal about Decision-Making Mechanisms
- (2008) Emilio Salinas NEURON
- After the Philosophy of Mind: Replacing Scholasticism with Science*
- (2008) Anthony Chemero et al. PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE
- Idealization and modeling
- (2008) Robert W. Batterman SYNTHESE
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started