Journal
FORESTS
Volume 6, Issue 10, Pages 3452-3482Publisher
MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/f6103452
Keywords
illegal logging; timber trade; tropical timber; market diversion; legality standards; emerging economies; EUTR; Lacey Act; Australian Illegal Logging Prohibition Act; FLEGT
Categories
Funding
- UKAID-funded KnowFOR (Forestry Knowledge) program
- CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees, and Agroforestry (FTA)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The European Union (EU), the United States of America (USA), and Australia have adopted specific measures to avoid the placing of illegal timber on their markets. These measures might encourage the diversion of timber products from traditional large importers to destinations with a less stringent regulatory framework. During 2001-2013, the international trade in tropical primary timber products (logs; sawnwood; veneers and plywood) decreased by 13% in volume and increased by almost 5% in value. Imports by Australia, the EU, and the USA halved, while those by emerging economies such as China and India initially remained stable and later increased. Tropical timber productsmostly logs and sawnwoodmight have been diverted towards emerging economies over the period considered. This general trend is confirmed when analyzing imports from countries that are implementing voluntary partnership agreements (VPA) within the EU Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade (FLEGT) Action Plan. Several factors might influence these market dynamics, including changes induced by the 2008 financial crisis and the increasing domestic demand for timber products by emerging nations. The effects of legality measures on market trends are still unclear. Nonetheless, they might have encouraged uncertainty with regards to traditional importers and favored emerging ones.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available