4.3 Article

Risk factors and measures of pulmonary complications after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer

Journal

SURGERY TODAY
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 176-186

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-018-1721-0

Keywords

Esophageal cancer; Thoracoscopic esophagectomy; Pulmonary complications; Delirium

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PurposePostoperative pulmonary complications (PCs) after thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer (EC) still occur too frequently. We conducted this study to identify the risk factors for PCs developing in EC patients who undergo thoracoscopic esophagectomy.MethodsThe subjects of this retrospective study were 89 patients with EC who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy in our department between January 2010 and December 2015. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between the incidence of PC and clinical factors. In January 2016, we introduced a new prophylactic intervention for reducing the incidence of delirium and assessed its significance for PCs.ResultsPCs developed in 19 patients (21.3%). Univariate analysis revealed the following risk factors: age (>69years), ratio of the forced expiratory volume in 1s to forced vital capacity (<70%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and postoperative delirium. Multivariate analysis found that COPD and postoperative delirium were independent risk factors for PCs. Our new intervention for delirium significantly reduced its occurrence (p=0.00004) and also the frequency of PCs (p=0.04148).ConclusionsPostoperative delirium and COPD were risk factors for PCs in patients who underwent thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Our intervention study showed clearly that reducing the occurrence of postoperative delirium could decrease the incidence of PCs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available