4.6 Article

Prognostic impact of marginal resection for patients with solitary hepatocellular carcinoma: Evidence from 570 hepatectomies

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 151, Issue 4, Pages 526-536

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.12.002

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of Japan [21-7-5]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. During resection of a hepatocellular carcinoma, surgeons encounter occasionally a situation where marginal resection is inevitable because of a close association between the hepatocellular carcinoma and major vasculature and/or underlying impaired liver function. We investigated the impact of marginal resection on recurrence-free survival after a resection of a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods. The data of 570 patients who underwent macroscopically curative hepatectomy for a solitary hepatocellular carcinoma in our institution between 1990 and 2007 were analyzed. Marginal resection and non-marginal resection were defined as a cancer-negative surgical margin of <= 1 mm and a Surgical margin of > 1 mm, respectively. The macroscopic appearance of the hepatocellular carcinoma was classified as the simple nodular type or non-simple nodular type based on the classification of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan, and patients were categorized into 4 groups: group A, simple nodular type with cirrhosis, group B, simple nodular type without cirrhosis; group C, non-simple nodular type with cirrhosis; and group D, non-simple nodular type without cirrhosis. Results. The surgical margins were diagnosed as cancer.-positive in 31 patients, as marginal resection in 165 patients, and as non-marginal resection in 374 patients. The marginal resection group showed a better recurrence-free survival than the positive surgical margin group (P = .001), and also a worse recurrence-free survival than the non marginal resection group (P = .003). In groups A, B, and C, the recurrence-free survival rates were similar between marginal resection and non-marginal resection patients (P = .458), while in group D, marginal resection was a significant poor prognostic factor of recurrence-free survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusion. Marginal resection is acceptable in group A, B, and C patients, because it did not negatively affect postoperative recurrence-free Survival. (Surgery 2012;151:526-36)

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available