4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Surgical autonomic denervation results in altered colonic motility: an explanation for low anterior resection syndrome?

Journal

SURGERY
Volume 143, Issue 6, Pages 778-783

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2008.03.014

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. We hypothesized that the bowel dysfunction known as low anterior resection syndrome is caused by denervation of the left colon. The purpose of this study is to determine how surgical denervation changes left colon motility and to identify the mechanism of this change. Materials and methods. Strain gauge transducers were implanted on the serosal surface of the descending colon of male SD rats (250-300 g). After a 2-h baseline recording, motility was recorded for another 2 h after either simple left colon manipulation (n = 6) or surgical left colon denervation (n = 6). Various pharmacologic agents were then administered before denervation to determine the mechanism by which denervation changed left colon motility. Changes in motility were calculated by determining a % motility index (MI) (%MI = MI posttreatment/MI baseline) with significance defined as P < .05. Result. Denervation resulted in an increased mean %MI (128.8 +/- 15.4) compared with simple manipulation of the bowel, which decreased mean %MI (87.9 +/- 25.3) (P <. 05). In the second set of experiments, both guanethidine and phentolomine increased mean %MI after injection (P < .05), but no additional increase of %MI occurred after denervation (P <. 05). However, propranolol produced no increase of motility after injection and it did not affect the increase in motility observed after denervation (P < .05). Conclusion. Surgical denervation of the left colon results in a significant increase in motility. Pharmacologically, this increase seems to be the result of destruction of an inhibitory alpha-sympathetic pathway. This increased motility may contribute to low anterior resection syndrome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available