4.5 Article

Peripheral refraction with eye and head rotation with contact lenses

Journal

CONTACT LENS & ANTERIOR EYE
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 104-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2014.11.201

Keywords

Peripheral refraction; Myopia; Multifocal contact lens; Eye rotation; Head rotation

Categories

Funding

  1. FEDER through the COMPETE Program
  2. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [PTDC/SAU-BEB/098391/2008, PTDC/SAU-BEB/098392/2008, PEST-C/FIS/UI607/2011]
  3. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [PTDC/SAU-BEB/098391/2008, PTDC/SAU-BEB/098392/2008] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of eye and head rotation in the measurement of peripheral refraction with an open-field autorefractometer in myopic eyes wearing two different center-distance designs of multifocal contact lenses (MFCLs). Methods: Nineteen right eyes from 19 myopic patients (average central M +/- SD = -2.67 +/- 1.66 D) aged 20-27 years (mean +/- SD = 23.2 +/- 3.3 years) were evaluated using a Grand-Seiko autorefractometer. Patients were fitted with one multifocal aspheric center-distance contact lens (Biofinity Multifocal D (R)) and with one multi-concentric MFCL (Acuvue Oasys for Presbyopia). Axial and peripheral refraction were evaluated by eye rotation and by head rotation under naked eye condition and with each MFCL fitted randomly and in independent sessions. Results: For the naked eye, refractive pattern (M, JO and J45) across the central 60 degrees of the horizontal visual field values did not show significant changes measured by rotating the eye or rotating the head (p > 0.05). Similar results were obtained wearing the Biofinity D, for both testing methods, no obtaining significant differences to M, JO and J45 values (p > 0.05). For Acuvue Oasys for presbyopia, also no differences were found when comparing measurements obtained by eye and head rotation (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis did not showed a significant interaction between testing method and lens type neither with measuring locations (MANOVA, p > 0.05). There were significant differences in M and JO values between naked eyes and each MFCL. Conclusion: Measurements of peripheral refraction by rotating the eye or rotating the head in myopic patients wearing dominant design or multi-concentric multifocal silicone hydrogel contact lens are comparable. (C) 2014 British Contact Lens Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available