4.4 Article

Repeated Immobilization Stress Increases Expression of β3-Adrenoceptor in the Left Ventricle and Atrium of the Rat Heart

Journal

STRESS AND HEALTH
Volume 30, Issue 4, Pages 301-309

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/smi.2515

Keywords

beta(3)-adrenergic receptor; stress; catecholamines; ventricle; atrium

Funding

  1. Slovak Research and Development Agency [APVV-0088-10, APVV-0148-06]
  2. VEGA [2/0036/11]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress is a contributor of many cardiovascular diseases. Positive inotropic and chronotropic effects of catecholamines are regulated via beta-adrenergic receptors (ARs). Many reports exist concerning changes of cardiac beta(1)- and beta(2)-ARs in stress, but only a few deal with modulation of cardiac beta(3)-AR. Our aim was to analyze the expression and binding sites of beta(1)-, beta(2)- and beta(3)-ARs and adenylyl cyclase activity in the left ventricle, and beta(3)-AR expression and binding in the left atrium of rats exposed to acute and chronic immobilization stress (IMO). The concentration of noradrenaline in the ventricle decreased, while adrenaline increased, especially after repeated IMO. The mRNA and protein levels, and binding sites of beta(3)-subtype significantly rose following chronic IMO, while all parameters for beta(2)-AR dropped after single and repeated exposure. Similarly, the mRNA levels and binding sites for beta(3)-subtype increased in the left atrium as a consequence of chronic IMO. The rise in beta(3)-subtypes and a drop in beta(2)-subtypes resulted in inhibition of adenylyl cyclase activity within the left ventricle. Taken together, among other factors, up-regulation of beta(3)-AR could represent an adaptation mechanism, which might be related to altered physiological function of the left ventricle and atrium during prolonged emotional stress and might serve cardioprotective function during catecholamine overload. Copyright (C) 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available