4.3 Article

Hypoxia imaging with [18F]-FMISO-PET for guided dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy in head-and-neck cancers

Journal

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume 191, Issue 3, Pages 217-224

Publisher

URBAN & VOGEL
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-014-0752-8

Keywords

FMISO-positron emission tomography; Intensity-modulated radiation therapy; Head-and-neck neoplasms; Dose painting; Treatment failure

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and purpose Positron emission tomography (PET) with [F-18]-fluoromisonidazole ([F-18]-FMISO) provides a non-invasive assessment of hypoxia. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility of a dose escalation with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) guided by [F-18]-FMISO-PET for head-and-neck cancers (HNC). Patients and methods Ten patients with inoperable stages III-IV HNC underwent [F-18]-FMISO-PET before radiotherapy. Hypoxic target volumes (HTV) were segmented automatically by using the fuzzy locally adaptive Bayesian method. Retrospectively, two VMAT plans were generated delivering 70 Gy to the gross tumour volume (GTV) defined on computed tomography simulation or 79.8 Gy to the HTV. A dosimetric comparison was performed, based on calculations of tumour control probability (TCP), normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) for the parotid glands and uncomplicated tumour control probability (UTCP). Results The mean hypoxic fraction, defined as the ratio between the HTV and the GTV, was 0.18. The mean average dose for both parotids was 22.7 Gy and 25.5 Gy without and with dose escalation respectively. FMISO-guided dose escalation led to a mean increase of TCP, NTCP for both parotids and UTCP by 18.1, 4.6 and 8 % respectively. Conclusion A dose escalation up to 79.8 Gy guided by [F-18]-FMISO-PET with VMAT seems feasible with improvement of TCP and without excessive increase of NTCP for parotids.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available