4.3 Article

Chemoradiotherapy with Weekly Cisplatin 40 mg/m2 in 103 Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients A Cumulative Dose-Effect Analysis

Journal

STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE
Volume 185, Issue 10, Pages 682-688

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00066-009-1989-5

Keywords

Chemoradiotherapy; Head-and-neck cancer; Cisplatin; Cumulative dose

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and Purpose: In patients with head-and-neck cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT), a cisplatin-based regimen is often used. Several treatment schedules are accepted with a cumulative cisplatin dose of 200 mg/m(2) (CisCD200) given during radiotherapy. The aim of this analysis was to investigate feasibility and efficacy of a weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) regimen. Patients and Methods: During 08/2001 and 12/2006, 103 patients with squamous head-and-neck cancer received concurrent CRT with intended weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) and were analyzed retrospectively. CRT was definitive for a newly diagnosed primary in 62, postoperative in 16, and for recurrence in 25 patients. Most patients had carcinoma of the hypo-and oropharynx (81%). Patients received a median total dose of 70 Gy (range, 42-71.2 Gy). Results: Only 42 patients (41%) received a CisCD200 predominantly due to hematotoxicity. Actuarial 12- and 18-month overall survival (OS) for patients with and without CisCD200 was 83.3% versus 72.1% (p = 0.19) and 66.7% versus 67.2% (p = 0.86), the 12-and 18-month locoregional control (LRC) 66.7% versus 78.7% (p = 0.325) and 59.5% versus 78.7% (p = 0.109), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed only type of CRT (definitive vs. recurrent) and T-classification as significant variables predicting OS and LRC. Conclusion: Feasibility and efficacy of CRT with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m(2) were suboptimal in this analysis. However, the prospects of weekly cisplatin may be its more suitable integration into emerging trimodality concepts combining CRT with molecularly targeted agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available