4.7 Article

Assessment of social vulnerability to natural hazards in the Yangtze River Delta, China

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-013-0725-y

Keywords

Social vulnerability index; Natural hazards; Projection pursuit cluster model; Yangtze River Delta

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41201547]
  2. National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program) [2011CB707103]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B08008]
  4. Key Project in the National Science & Technology Pillar Program in the Eleventh Five-year Plan Period [2008BAK50B07]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

China is exposed to a wide range of natural hazards, and disaster losses have escalated over the past decade. Owing to the pressure from natural disasters, along with changes in climate, social conditions, and regional environment, assessment of social vulnerability (SV) to natural hazards has become increasingly urgent for risk management and sustainable development in China. This paper presents a new method for quantifying SV based on the projection pursuit cluster (PPC) model. A reference social vulnerability index (SVI) at the county level was created for the Yangtze River Delta area in China for 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2009. The result of social vulnerability assessment was validated using data of actual losses from natural disasters. The primary findings are as follows: (i) In the study area, the major factors that impact SVI are regional per capita GDP and per capita income. (ii) The study area was more vulnerable in 1995 than in later years. SV of the whole region had decreased over the study period. (iii) Most part of Shanghai and the southeast part of Jiangsu Province had been the least vulnerable within the region. From this least vulnerable zone to the periphery of the region, the situation deteriorated. The highest SVI values in all evaluated years were found in the northern, western, or southern tips of the Yangtze River Delta.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available