Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Propensity score methods for estimating relative risks in cluster randomized trials with low-incidence binary outcomes and selection bias
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 33, Issue 20, Pages 3556-3575
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2014-04-28
DOI
10.1002/sim.6185
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The z-difference can be used to measure covariate balance in matched propensity score analyses
- (2013) Oliver Kuss JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Propensity scores used for analysis of cluster randomized trials with selection bias: a simulation study
- (2013) C. Leyrat et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Dichotomizing a continuous outcome in cluster randomized trials: impact on power
- (2012) Agnès Caille et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Doubly Robust and Multiple-Imputation-Based Generalized Estimating Equations
- (2011) Teshome Birhanu et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- The “best balance” allocation led to optimal balance in cluster-controlled trials
- (2011) Esther de Hoop et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Bias in recruitment to cluster randomized trials: a review of recent publications
- (2011) Gwen Brierley et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- The implications of propensity score variable selection strategies in pharmacoepidemiology: an empirical illustration
- (2011) Amanda R. Patrick et al. PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY
- Weight Trimming and Propensity Score Weighting
- (2011) Brian K. Lee et al. PLoS One
- Propensity scores: From naïve enthusiasm to intuitive understanding
- (2011) Elizabeth Williamson et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Extension of the modified Poisson regression model to prospective studies with correlated binary data
- (2011) GY Zou et al. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
- Sample Size Considerations for GEE Analyses of Three-Level Cluster Randomized Trials
- (2010) Steven Teerenstra et al. BIOMETRICS
- Propensity score estimation: neural networks, support vector machines, decision trees (CART), and meta-classifiers as alternatives to logistic regression
- (2010) Daniel Westreich et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Cluster size variability and imbalance in cluster randomized controlled trials
- (2010) Ben Carter STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating differences in proportions (risk differences or absolute risk reductions) in observational studies
- (2010) Peter C. Austin STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- The Relative Merits of Risk Ratios and Odds Ratios
- (2009) Peter Cummings ARCHIVES OF PEDIATRICS & ADOLESCENT MEDICINE
- Use of Stabilized Inverse Propensity Scores as Weights to Directly Estimate Relative Risk and Its Confidence Intervals
- (2009) Stanley Xu et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Preventing Bias in Cluster Randomised Trials
- (2009) Bruno Giraudeau et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Primary care management of major depression in patients aged ≥55 years:
- (2008) Harm WJ van Marwijk et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE
- The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks
- (2008) Peter C. Austin JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Finite sample adjustments in estimating equations and covariance estimators for intracluster correlations
- (2008) John S. Preisser et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Internal and external validity of cluster randomised trials: systematic review of recent trials
- (2008) Sandra Eldridge et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started