How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
How to interpret a small increase in AUC with an additional risk prediction marker: decision analysis comes through
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 33, Issue 22, Pages 3946-3959
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2014-05-14
DOI
10.1002/sim.6195
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Net Reclassification Improvement: Computation, Interpretation, and Controversies
- (2014) Maarten J.G. Leening et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Net Risk Reclassification P Values: Valid or Misleading?
- (2014) Margaret S. Pepe et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Value of information methods for assessing a new diagnostic test
- (2014) Maggie Hong Chen et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Reclassification Calculations for Persons With Incomplete Follow-up
- (2013) Ewout W. Steyerberg ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Reclassification of predictions for uncovering subgroup specific improvement
- (2013) Swati Biswas et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A clinical prediction model to assess the risk of operative delivery
- (2012) E Schuit et al. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY
- Evaluating a New Marker for Risk Prediction Using the Test Tradeoff: An Update
- (2012) Stuart G. Baker et al.
- It takes time: A remarkable example of delayed recognition
- (2012) Ben Van Calster JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
- Understanding increments in model performance metrics
- (2012) Michael J. Pencina et al. LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS
- Comparing costs associated with risk stratification rules for t-year survival
- (2011) T. Cai et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Transparency and reproducibility in data analysis: the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial
- (2010) S. G. Baker et al. BIOSTATISTICS
- Assessment of Claims of Improved Prediction Beyond the Framingham Risk Score
- (2009) Ioanna Tzoulaki JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Re: Discriminatory Accuracy From Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Models to Predict Breast Cancer Risk
- (2009) M. R. Spitz et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Putting Risk Prediction in Perspective: Relative Utility Curves
- (2009) Stuart G. Baker JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Using relative utility curves to evaluate risk prediction
- (2009) Stuart G. Baker et al. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY
- Measuring classifier performance: a coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve
- (2009) David J. Hand MACHINE LEARNING
- The Skill Plot: A Graphical Technique for Evaluating Continuous Diagnostic Tests
- (2008) William M. Briggs et al. BIOMETRICS
- Extensions to decision curve analysis, a novel method for evaluating diagnostic tests, prediction models and molecular markers
- (2008) Andrew J Vickers et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started