- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Traditional multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Volume 32, Issue 29, Pages 5172-5218
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2013-10-12
DOI
10.1002/sim.5990
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Multiple hypothesis testing in genomics
- (2014) Jelle J. Goeman et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Selection of Hypothesis Weights and Ordering When Testing Multiple Hypotheses in Clinical Trials
- (2013) Brian L. Wiens et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Advanced multiplicity adjustment methods in clinical trials
- (2013) Mohamed Alosh et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Simultaneous confidence regions for closed tests, including Holm-, Hochberg-, and Hommel-related procedures
- (2012) Olivier Guilbaud BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- Key multiplicity issues in clinical drug development
- (2012) Alex Dmitrienko et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Extension of adaptive alpha allocation methods for strong control of the family-wise error rate
- (2012) Haihong Li et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Development of gatekeeping strategies in confirmatory clinical trials
- (2011) Alex Dmitrienko et al. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- A Mixture Gatekeeping Procedure Based on the Hommel Test for Clinical Trial Applications
- (2011) Thomas Brechenmacher et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Addressing Multiplicity Issues of a Composite Endpoint and Its Components in Clinical Trials
- (2011) Mohammad F. Huque et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Confidence Regions for Bonferroni-Based Closed Tests Extended to More General Closed Tests
- (2011) Olivier Guilbaud et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Chain Procedures: A Class of Flexible Closed Testing Procedures With Clinical Trial Applications
- (2011) Brian A. Millen et al. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- The sequential rejection principle of familywise error control
- (2010) Jelle J. Goeman et al. ANNALS OF STATISTICS
- Testing for Efficacy in Primary and Secondary Endpoints by Partitioning Decision Paths
- (2010) Yi Liu et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION
- Method of balanced adjustment in testing co-primary endpoints
- (2010) George Kordzakhia et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Design and Analysis Considerations in Clinical Trials With a Sensitive Subpopulation
- (2010) Yan D. Zhao et al. Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research
- Discussion of “Some Controversial Multiple Testing Problems in Regulatory Applications”
- (2009) Christy Chuang-stein et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- Some Controversial Multiple Testing Problems in Regulatory Applications
- (2009) H. M. James Hung et al. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
- A recycling framework for the construction of Bonferroni-based multiple tests
- (2009) C.-F. Burman et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- Simultaneous Confidence Regions Corresponding to Holm's Step-Down Procedure and Other Closed-Testing Procedures
- (2008) Olivier Guilbaud BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- General Multistage Gatekeeping Procedures
- (2008) Alex Dmitrienko et al. BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL
- Compatible simultaneous lower confidence bounds for the Holm procedure and other Bonferroni-based closed tests
- (2008) Klaus Strassburger et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- An efficient method for accommodating potentially underpowered primary endpoints
- (2008) Jianjun (David) Li et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A flexible strategy for testing subgroups and overall population
- (2008) Mohamed Alosh et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
- A graphical approach to sequentially rejective multiple test procedures
- (2008) Frank Bretz et al. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started