4.6 Article

Causal inference with a quantitative exposure

Journal

STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 314-335

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0962280212452333

Keywords

Dose-response relationship; double robustness; inverse probability weighting; outcome regression; propensity function; propensity score; stratification

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health
  2. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The current statistical literature on causal inference is mostly concerned with binary or categorical exposures, even though exposures of a quantitative nature are frequently encountered in epidemiologic research. In this article, we review the available methods for estimating the dose-response curve for a quantitative exposure, which include ordinary regression based on an outcome regression model, inverse propensity weighting and stratification based on a propensity function model, and an augmented inverse propensity weighting method that is doubly robust with respect to the two models. We note that an outcome regression model often imposes an implicit constraint on the dose-response curve, and propose a flexible modeling strategy that avoids constraining the dose-response curve. We also propose two new methods: a weighted regression method that combines ordinary regression with inverse propensity weighting and a stratified regression method that combines ordinary regression with stratification. The proposed methods are similar to the augmented inverse propensity weighting method in the sense of double robustness, but easier to implement and more generally applicable. The methods are illustrated with an obstetric example and compared in simulation studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available