Operative Duration as an Independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Single-Level Lumbar Fusion
Published 2013 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Operative Duration as an Independent Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Single-Level Lumbar Fusion
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SPINE
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 510-520
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Online
2013-12-24
DOI
10.1097/brs.0000000000000163
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Longer operative time is associated with higher risk of severe complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Analysis of 1511 cases from a Japanese nationwide database
- (2013) Toru Sugihara et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- The Incidence and Mortality of Thromboembolic Events in Lumbar Spine Surgery
- (2013) Steven J. Fineberg et al. SPINE
- Impact of operative duration on postoperative pulmonary complications in laparoscopic versus open colectomy
- (2013) Rachel M. Owen et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- The influence of tourniquet use and operative time on the incidence of deep vein thrombosis in total knee arthroplasty
- (2012) AJ Hernandez et al. Clinics
- Prolonged operative time increases infection rate in tibial plateau fractures
- (2012) Matthew Colman et al. INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED
- Predictive Factors for the Use of Autologous Cell Saver Transfusion in Lumbar Spinal Surgery
- (2012) Roger Kirk Owens et al. SPINE
- Factors Influencing Laparoscopic Colorectal Operative Duration and its Effect on Clinical Outcome
- (2012) Charles Evans et al. SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES
- Does speed matter? The impact of operative time on outcome in laparoscopic surgery
- (2011) Timothy D. Jackson et al. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES
- Efficacy of tranexamic acid in reducing blood loss in posterior lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal stenosis with instability: a retrospective case control study
- (2011) Stefan Endres et al. BMC Surgery
- Predicting poor outcome following hepatectomy: analysis of 2313 hepatectomies in the NSQIP database
- (2010) Thomas A. Aloia et al. HPB
- Successful Implementation of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in the Private Sector: The Patient Safety in Surgery Study
- (2009) Shukri F. Khuri et al. ANNALS OF SURGERY
- Intraoperative Transfusion of 1 U to 2 U Packed Red Blood Cells Is Associated with Increased 30-Day Mortality, Surgical-Site Infection, Pneumonia, and Sepsis in General Surgery Patients
- (2009) Andrew C. Bernard et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Toward Robust Information: Data Quality and Inter-Rater Reliability in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
- (2009) Mira Shiloach et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- General Surgical Operative Duration Is Associated with Increased Risk-Adjusted Infectious Complication Rates and Length of Hospital Stay
- (2009) Levi D. Procter et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Thromboembolic Disease in Spinal Surgery
- (2009) Michael P. Glotzbecker et al. SPINE
- Surgical Site Infection Prevention: The Importance of Operative Duration and Blood Transfusion—Results of the First American College of Surgeons–National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative
- (2008) Darrell A. Campbell et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
- Blueprint for a New American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
- (2008) John D. Birkmeyer et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started