4.3 Article

Kinematic characteristics of tenodesis grasp in C6 quadriplegia

Journal

SPINAL CORD
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 144-149

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/sc.2012.101

Keywords

kinematics; prehension; tenodesis grasp; C6 quadriplegia; spinal cord injury

Funding

  1. Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique Interregional 2010 [541/142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study design: Descriptive control case study. Objectives: To analyze the kinematics of tenodesis grasp in participants with C6 quadriplegia and healthy control participants in a pointing task and two daily life tasks involving a whole hand grip (apple) or a lateral grip (floppy disk). Setting: France. Methods: Four complete participants with C6 quadriplegia were age matched with four healthy control participants. All participants were right-handed. The measured kinematic parameters were the movement time (MT), the peak velocity (PV), the time of PV (TPV) and the wrist angle in the sagittal plane at movement onset, at the TPV and at the movement end point. Results: The participants with C6 quadriplegia had significantly longer MTs in both prehension tasks. No significant differences in TPV were found between the two groups. Unlike control participants, for both prehension tasks the wrist of participants with C6 quadriplegia was in a neutral position at movement onset, in flexion at the TPV, and in extension at the movement end point. Conclusion: Two main kinematic parameters characterize tenodesis grasp movements in C6 quadriplegics: wrist flexion during reaching and wrist extension during the grasping phase, and increased MT reflecting the time required to adjust the wrist's position to achieve the tenodesis grasp. These characteristics were observed for two different grips (whole hand and lateral grip). These results suggest sequential planning of reaching and tenodesis grasp, and should be taken into account for prehension rehabilitation in patients with quadriplegia. Spinal Cord (2013) 51, 144-149; doi:10.1038/sc.2012.101; published online 4 September 2012

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available