Diagnostic accuracy of the Whooley questions for the identification of depression: a diagnostic meta-analysis
Published 2015 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of the Whooley questions for the identification of depression: a diagnostic meta-analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMJ Open
Volume 5, Issue 12, Pages e008913
Publisher
BMJ
Online
2015-12-11
DOI
10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008913
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Assessing validity of a depression screening instrument in the absence of a gold standard
- (2014) Bizu Gelaye et al. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2013) David Moher ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies
- (2013) Penny F. Whiting ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Recommendations on screening for depression in adults
- (2013) et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Diagnostic accuracy of case-finding questions to identify perinatal depression
- (2012) R. Mann et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Diagnosis and treatment of depression following routine screening in patients with coronary heart disease or diabetes: a database cohort study
- (2012) C. Burton et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE
- Validation of the Whooley questions and the Beck Depression Inventory in older adults
- (2012) Kadri Suija et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
- Combination use of Beck Depression Inventory and two-question case-finding instrument as a screening tool for depression in the workplace
- (2012) Yasunori Adachi et al. BMJ Open
- Validity of the PHQ-2 for the screening of major depression in Parkinson's disease: Two questions and one important answer
- (2011) Marcos H.N. Chagas et al. AGING & MENTAL HEALTH
- The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 for detection of major depressive disorder in primary care: consequences of current thresholds in a crosssectional study
- (2011) Nicolaas PA Zuithoff et al. BMC Family Practice
- The 'help' question doesn't help when screening for major depression: external validation of the three-question screening test for primary care patients managed for physical complaints
- (2011) Patrick Lombardo et al. BMC Medicine
- Screening for Depression with a Brief Questionnaire in a Primary Care Setting: Validation of the Two Questions with Help Question (Malay Version)
- (2011) Sherina Mohd-Sidik et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY IN MEDICINE
- Sensitivity and specificity of the Distress Thermometer and a two-item depression screen (Patient Health Questionnaire-2) with a ‘help’ question for psychological distress and psychiatric morbidity in patients with advanced cancer
- (2011) Dermot Anthony Ryan et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Postpartum Depression Screening at Well-Child Visits: Validity of a 2-Question Screen and the PHQ-9
- (2009) D. Gjerdingen et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Depression in the elderly in Vellore, South India: the use of a two-question screen
- (2009) S. S. Biswas et al. INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
- Reliability and Validity of Prehospital Case Finding for Depression and Cognitive Impairment
- (2009) Manish N. Shah et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY
- Assessing the quality of diagnostic studies using psychometric instruments: applying QUADAS
- (2008) Rachel Mann et al. SOCIAL PSYCHIATRY AND PSYCHIATRIC EPIDEMIOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started