4.5 Review

Solar Wind and Internally Driven Dynamics: Influences on Magnetodiscs and Auroral Responses

Journal

SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS
Volume 187, Issue 1-4, Pages 51-97

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11214-014-0075-1

Keywords

Neutral clouds; Plasma torus; Momentum loading; Dynamics; Aurora; Magnetodiscs; Reconnection; Solar wind

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX13AH309G, NNX12AK34G]
  2. NASA Outer Planets Research Program [NNX12AM74G]
  3. NASA Cassini mission [1409449]
  4. JPL
  5. NSF [1064635]
  6. Royal Society
  7. NASA [43472, NNX12AM74G, 69713, NNX12AK34G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/I004084/1, ST/K000977/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. STFC [ST/I004084/1, ST/K000977/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  10. Office Of The Director
  11. Office Of Internatl Science &Engineering [1064635] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The dynamics of the giant planet magnetodiscs are strongly influenced by planetary rotation. Yet the solar wind must ultimately remove plasma from these rapidly rotating magnetodiscs at the same rate that plasma is transported radially outward from the source regions: the Io and Enceladus plasma tori. It is not clear how the solar wind influences magnetospheric dynamics when the dynamics are dominated by rotation. However, auroral observations provide important clues. We review magnetodisc sources and radial transport and the solar wind interaction with the giant magnetospheres of Jupiter and Saturn in an attempt to connect auroral features with specific drivers. We provide a discussion of auroral signatures that are related to the solar wind interaction and summarize with a discussion of global magnetospheric dynamics as illustrated by global MHD simulations. Many questions remain and it is the intent of this review to highlight several of the most compelling questions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available