4.3 Article

Impact of CIR Storms on Thermosphere Density Variability during the Solar Minimum of 2008

Journal

SOLAR PHYSICS
Volume 274, Issue 1-2, Pages 427-437

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-010-9563-y

Keywords

Thermosphere density; CIR; Coronal holes; Solar minimum

Funding

  1. NASA [NNX10AE62G, LWS NNX08AQ91G, NNX20AE61G]
  2. AFOSR MURI [FA9550-07-1-0565]
  3. National Science Foundation [ATM-0120950]
  4. NASA [135160, NNX10AE62G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The solar minimum of 2008 was exceptionally quiet, with sunspot numbers at their lowest in 75 years. During this unique solar-minimum epoch, however, solar-wind high-speed streams emanating from near-equatorial coronal holes occurred frequently and were the primary contributor to the recurrent geomagnetic activity at Earth. These conditions enabled the isolation of forcing by geomagnetic activity on the preconditioned solar minimum state of the upper atmosphere caused by Corotating Interaction Regions (CIRs). Thermosphere density observations around 400 km from the CHAMP satellite are used to study the thermosphere density response to solar-wind high-speed streams/CIRs. Superposed epoch results show that the thermosphere density responds to high-speed streams globally, and the density at 400 km changes by 75% on average. The relative changes of neutral density are comparable at different latitudes, although its variability is largest at high latitudes. In addition, the response of thermosphere density to high-speed streams is larger at night than in daytime, indicating the preconditioning effect of the thermosphere response to storms. Finally, the thermosphere density variations at the periods of 9 and 13.5 days associated with CIRs are linked to the spatial distribution of low -aEuro parts per thousand middle latitude coronal holes on the basis of the EUVI observations from STEREO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available