4.5 Article

The potential for Scottish cultivated topsoils to lose or gain soil organic carbon

Journal

SOIL USE AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 29, Issue 1, Pages 39-47

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/sum.12009

Keywords

Soil organic carbon; carbon storage; agriculture; mitigation; Scotland

Categories

Funding

  1. Scottish Government's Rural and Environment Science and Analytical Services Division

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scotland's cultivated topsoils are rich in carbon with a median soil organic carbon (SOC) content of ca. 3.65%. The storage of carbon in soil is a means to offset GHG emissions, but equally carbon losses from soils can add to these emissions. We estimate the amount of carbon stored in Scottish cultivated mineral topsoils (246 +/- 9Mt), the potential carbon loss (112 +/- 12Mt) and the carbon storage potential of between 150 and 215Mt based on national-scale legacy data with uncertainty around the estimate due to error terms in predicting bulk densities for stock calculations. We calculate that Scotland's mineral cultivated topsoils hold the carbon equivalent of around 18years of GHG emissions (based on 2009 emissions from all sources). We also derive a theoretical carbon saturation potential using a published, linear relationship with the <20-m mineral fraction (116 +/- 14Mt). Although the calculated uncertainties are quite small, care needs to be taken when using the results of such analyses as a policy instrument, and while the potential storage capacity seems large, it is unlikely to be achieved while still maintaining current land use patterns in Scotland. The methodology relies on legacy data (which may not reflect the current status of Scottish cultivated topsoils) and on summary statistics calculated from national-scale data; however, those land management strategies that may mitigate GHG emissions are likely to be implemented at the field scale.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available