4.7 Article

Varying atmospheric methane concentrations affect soil methane oxidation rates and methanotroph populations in pasture, an adjacent pine forest, and a landfill

Journal

SOIL BIOLOGY & BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 52, Issue -, Pages 75-81

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.04.011

Keywords

Methane concentration; Soil methane oxidation; Methanotrophs; Forest; Pasture; Landfill

Categories

Funding

  1. Landcare Research
  2. MAF

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe experiments to better understand how CH4 oxidation rates by different methanotroph communities respond to changing CH4 concentrations. We used a novel system of automatically monitored chambers to investigate the response of CH4 oxidation rates in a New Zealand pasture and adjacent pine forest soil exposed to varying atmospheric CH4 concentrations. Type II methanotrophs that dominate CH4 oxidation in the forest soil became progressively saturated as CH4 concentrations rose from ambient (1.8 ppmv) to 570 ppmv, as shown by a decrease in uptake efficiency from 20% to 2% removal. By contrast, CH4 oxidation in the pasture soil where Type I methanotrophs dominate increased in proportion to the increase in CH4 inlet concentration, oxidising about 2% of the inlet CH4 flux throughout. Modelling based on Michaelis-Menten kinetics revealed that low-affinity (Type I) methanotrophs were solely responsible for CH4 oxidation in pasture soils, whereas high affinity (Type II) methanotrophs only contributed about 10% of the CH4 oxidation in the forest soil. Increased aeration status using a soil-perlite (1:1) mixture doubled CH4 oxidation rates at both ambient (1.8 ppmv) and 40 ppmv atmospheric CH4. A similar volcanic soil previously exposed for 8 y to high CH4 fluxes from a landfill had removal efficiencies consistently above 95% for atmospheric CH4 concentrations up to 7500 ppmv when the CH4 oxidation rate was7000 mu g CH4 kg(-1) soil h(-1). (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available