4.1 Article

Kinetic Extractions of Nickel and Lead from Some Contaminated Calcareous Soils

Journal

SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 56-71

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2012.714420

Keywords

Nickel; lead; contaminated soils; kinetics; release rates

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mobility of heavy metals in contaminated soils is dependent on the kinetics release from soils. Metal extraction over time is commonly used to distinguish two or more fractions of metal based on differences of extraction or release rates. Kinetic studies using 0.01 M CaCl2, 0.01 M malic acid, and 0.01 M EDTA extractions were performed to characterize nickel (Ni) and lead (Pb) kinetic release in 10 contaminated calcareous soils. Proportions of Ni and Pb extracted with EDTA were higher than when using malic acid and CaCl2, respectively. The release of Ni and Pb was characterized by an initial fast rate followed by a slower rate and could best be described by a two first-order reactions model with rate constants k1 and k2 and two metal pools: readily labile (Q 1) and less labile (Q 2). In an EDTA extractant, different Q1 /Q2 ratios for Ni and Pb were observed, indicating binding energies to soil constituents is not comparable. The k1 of the model for Ni (average of 10 soils: 0.2204 h-1 and 0.2359 h-1 for 0.01 M CaCl2 and 0.01 EDTA, respectively) was higher than Pb (0.1044 h-1 and 0.1631 h-1 for 0.01 M CaCl2 and 0.01 M EDTA, respectively), indicating a higher potential of Ni for leaching and groundwater contamination in contaminated calcareous soils. Relationships between the fraction of Ni and Pb determined with the two first-order reactions model and the soil composition and Pb fractions were established. The results indicated that the efficiency of the extractions Ni and Pb from soils depends both on the Ni and Pb content and soil composition. Overall, the results indicated that the use of a 0.01 M malic acid washing solution would be preferred in the field condition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available