4.1 Article

Spatial Variation and Fractionation of Bed Sediment-Borne Copper, Zinc, Lead, and Cadmium in a Stream System Affected by Acid Mine Drainage

Journal

SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION
Volume 21, Issue 7, Pages 831-849

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2012.697933

Keywords

Streambed sediment; acid mine drainage; heavy metals; metal fractionation; spatial variation; environmental impact

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [40471067, 40773058]
  2. Guangdong Bureau of Science and Technology [2005A30402006]
  3. South China Institute of Environmental Sciences [206030201-2009-K]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An investigation was conducted to examine the spatial variation and fractionation of bed sediment-borne Cu, Zn, Pb, and Cd in a stream system affected by acid mine drainage. The pH had a major control on the spatial variation pattern of soluble, exchangeable, and carbonate-bound Cu, Zn, and Cd. There was a prominent concentration peak of carbonate-bound, oxide-bound, and organic-bound metals at the 29 km station, as controlled by the abundance of organic C, carbonate C, and oxides of manganese and iron. In general, the residual fraction was the dominant form for all four investigated metals. It was likely that oxide-Mn played a more important role in binding Zn and Cd than oxide-Fe did. In contrast, Cu had a higher affinity for iron hydrous oxides than for manganese oxide. Pb had a higher affinity for oxides of iron and manganese than for carbonates and organic matter. The presence of organic-bound metals in both the acidic upstream reach and non-acidic downstream reach suggests that the binding of these metals by organic matter was not markedly affected by pH, while the correspondence of organic C peak and organic-bound metal peaks at the 29 km station indicates a strong control by organic matter abundance on the quantity of organic-complexed metals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available