4.1 Article

The Effect of Temperature and Aeration Rate on Bioremediation of Diesel-contaminated Soil in Solid-phase Bench-scale Bioreactors

Journal

SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION
Volume 20, Issue 4, Pages 353-369

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15320383.2011.571311

Keywords

aerated; biopile; petroleum hydrocarbons; volatilization; biodegradation; cold climate

Funding

  1. Canadian Department of National Defense
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bioremediation of hydrocarbon (HC) contaminated soils is most effective in aerobic conditions. Despite the fact that mass transfer of oxygen is an important process parameter, the effect of this parameter on solid-phase bioremediation has received limited attention. In this study, the combined effect of temperature and aeration on the bioremediation of low organic content coarse-grained soils, freshly contaminated with diesel, was investigated in solid-phase bench-scale bioreactors. Total HC and carbon range soil concentrations, volatilization, and microbial activity were monitored throughout the six-month experiments at two temperatures (7 and 22 degrees C) and at two aeration rates (13 and 45 mL center dot s-1). Total HC removal reached between 48 and 83%. Generally, removal increased proportionally with temperature and aeration rates, and decreased proportionally with HC compounds molecular weight. Both biodegradation and volatilization played important roles in removal in all treatments. The high aeration rate enhanced microbial activity in soil. Enhancement was believed to be due to increased mass transfer of oxygen from the soil gas to the soil solution, where microbial activity occurs. However, high aeration also enhanced volatilization, especially at 22 degrees C where 51% of HCs were lost to volatilization. High aeration rate enhanced biodegradation of compounds nC15 without promoting their excessive volatilization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available