4.6 Article

Phase diagrams of binary mixtures of patchy colloids with distinct numbers of patches: the network fluid regime

Journal

SOFT MATTER
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages 5615-5626

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c0sm01493a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) [POCTI/ISFL/2/618, PTDC/FIS/098254/2008]
  2. Comunidad de Madrid, Spain [MODELICO-CM/S2009ESP-1691]
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education [FIS2008-05865-C02-02, EX2009-0121]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We calculate the network fluid regime and phase diagrams of binary mixtures of patchy colloids, using Wertheim's first order perturbation theory and a generalization of Flory-Stockmayer's theory of polymerization. The colloids are modelled as hard spheres with the same diameter and surface patches of the same type, A. The only difference between species is the number of their patches - or functionality -f(A)((1)) and f(A)((2)) (with f(A)((2) > f(A)((1))). We have found that the difference in functionality is the key factor controlling the behaviour of the mixture in the network (percolated) fluid regime. In particular, when f(A)((2)) >= 2f(A)((1)) the entropy of bonding drives the phase separation of two network fluids, which is absent in other mixtures. This drastically changes the critical properties of the system and drives a change in the topology of the phase diagram (from type I to type V) when f(A)((1)) > 2. The difference in functionality also determines the miscibility at high (osmotic) pressures. If f(A)((2)) - f(A)((1)) = 1, the mixture is completely miscible at high pressures, while closed miscibility gaps at pressures above the highest critical pressure of the pure fluids are present if f(A)((2)) - f(A)((1)) > 1. We argue that this phase behaviour is driven by a competition between the entropy of mixing and the entropy of bonding, as the latter dominates in the network fluid regime.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available