4.5 Article

Differential reward responses during competition against in- and out-of-network others

Journal

SOCIAL COGNITIVE AND AFFECTIVE NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 412-420

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/scan/nst006

Keywords

effective connectivity; medial prefrontal cortex; social network; striatum; valuation

Funding

  1. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH084081] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Social interactions occur within a variety of different contexts-cooperative/competitive-and often involve members of our social network. Here, we investigated whether social network modulated the value placed on positive outcomes during a competitive context. Eighteen human participants played a simple card-guessing game with three different competitors: a close friend (in-network), a confederate (out-of-network) and a random number generator (non-social condition) while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimaging results at the time of outcome receipt demonstrated a significant main effect of competitor across multiple regions of medial prefrontal cortex, with Blood Oxygen Level Dependent (BOLD) responses strongest when competing against one's friend compared with all other conditions. Striatal BOLD responses demonstrated a more general sensitivity to positive compared with negative monetary outcomes, which an exploratory analysis revealed to be stronger when interacting with social, compared with non-social, competitors. Interestingly, a Granger causality analysis indicated directed influences sent from an medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) region, which shows social network differentiation of outcomes, and the ventral striatum bilaterally. Our results suggest that when competing against others of varying degrees of social network, mPFC differentially values these outcomes, perhaps treating in-network outcomes as more informative, leaving the striatum to more general value computations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available