4.6 Article

Objectively measured sleep duration and hyperglycemia in pregnancy

Journal

SLEEP MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 51-55

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2013.07.018

Keywords

Actigraphy; Pregnancy; Hyperglycemia; Gestational diabetes; Nighttime sleep duration; Daytime sleep duration; Nap frequency

Funding

  1. US National Institutes of Health [R01 HD038856, K23 HL106231]
  2. Temple University Department of Medicine
  3. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation [2012065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Our primary purpose was to assess the impact of objectively measured nighttime sleep duration on gestational glucose tolerance. We additionally examined associations of objectively measured daytime sleep duration and nap frequency on maternal glycemic control. Methods: Sixty-three urban, low-income, pregnant women wore wrist actigraphs for an average of 6 full days in mid-pregnancy prior to screening for hyperglycemia using the 1-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Correlations of nighttime and daytime sleep durations with 1-h OGTT values were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate independent associations between sleep parameters and hyperglycemia, defined as 1-h OGTT values >= 130 mg/dL. Results: Mean nighttime sleep duration was 6.9 +/- 0.9 h which was inversely correlated with 1-h OGTT values (r = -0.28, P = .03). Shorter nighttime sleep was associated with hyperglycemia, even after controlling for age and body mass index (adjusted odds ratio [ OR], 0.2 [ 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.1-0.8]). There were no associations of daytime sleep duration and nap frequency with 1-h OGTT values or hyperglycemia. Conclusions: Using objective measures of maternal sleep time, we found that women with shorter nighttime sleep durations had an increased risk for gestational hyperglycemia. Larger prospective studies are needed to confirm our negative daytime sleep findings. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available