4.6 Article

Attenuated Heart Rate Response is Associated with Hypocretin Deficiency in Patients with Narcolepsy

Journal

SLEEP
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 91-98

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.5665/sleep.2308

Keywords

Arousal; autonomic dysfunction; heart rate response; hypocretin-1; narcolepsy

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objective: Several studies have suggested that hypocretin-1 may influence the cerebral control of the cardiovascular system. We analyzed whether hypocretin-1 deficiency in narcolepsy patients may result in a reduced heart rate response. Design: We analyzed the heart rate response during various sleep stages from a 1-night polysomnography in patients with narcolepsy and healthy controls. The narcolepsy group was subdivided by the presence of +/-cataplexy and +/-hypocretin-1 deficiency. Setting: Sleep laboratory studies conducted from 2001-2011. Participants: In total 67 narcolepsy patients and 22 control subjects were included in the study. Cataplexy was present in 46 patients and hypocretin-1 deficiency in 38 patients. Interventions: None. Measurements and Results: All patients with narcolepsy had a significantly reduced heart rate response associated with arousals and leg movements (P < 0.05). Heart rate response associated with arousals was significantly lower in the hypocretin-1 deficiency and cataplexy groups compared with patients with normal hypocretin-1 levels (P < 0.04) and patients without cataplexy (P < 0.04). Only hypocretin-1 deficiency significantly predicted the heart rate response associated with arousals in both REM and non-REM in a multivariate linear regression. Conclusions: Our results show that autonomic dysfunction is part of the narcoleptic phenotype, and that hypocretin-1 deficiency is the primary predictor of this dysfunction. This finding suggests that the hypocretin system participates in the modulation of cardiovascular function at rest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available