4.6 Article

Pulse Transit Time in Screening Sleep Disordered Breathing In An Elderly Population: The PROOF-SYNAPSE Study

Journal

SLEEP
Volume 34, Issue 8, Pages 1051-1059

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.5665/SLEEP.1160

Keywords

Sleep-disordered breathing; screening; autonomic function; arousal; aging

Funding

  1. French Ministry of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Study Objectives: Pulse transit time (PPT) has been introduced as a useful screening tool to diagnose sleep disordered breathing (SDB). Since the prevalence of SDB increases with age, the question is whether PTT could be used to diagnose SDB in the elderly. We assess the effectiveness of PTT for SDB screening in a large healthy elderly population. Setting: Community-based sample in home and research clinical settings. Intervention: N/A. Participants: Seven hundred eighty volunteers, free of cardiac and neurologic disease, aged 68.6 +/- 1.0 years, underwent ambulatory polygraphy to measure the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI). The presence of SDB was defined as an AHI of 15 or greater. The PTT was continuously monitored during the nocturnal study, and the overall autonomic arousal index (AAI) was calculated. Results: SDB was diagnosed in 447 (57.3%) subjects. In these subjects, the Bland-Altman plot for AAI revealed an underestimation with a bias of -8.04 +/- 16.55 events per hour (mean +/- 95% confidence interval). Receiver operating characteristic curves constructed for an AHI of 15 or greater defined an area under the curve of 0.67 and a cutoff point to AAI 32.3 events per hour, giving a sensitivity of 70.5% and a specificity of 54.7%. For prediction of an AHI of at least 30, the area under the curve was equal to 0.74 for a cutoff point of 56.3 events per hour, giving a better specificity (94.7%) but a lower sensitivity (32.2%). Conclusions: In a healthy older population, the AAI showed moderate sensitivity for predicting SDB. This data does not allow us the use PTT as a screening tool for the diagnosis of SDB in the elderly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available