4.0 Review

Importance of promoting HIV testing for preventing secondary transmissions: modelling the Australian HIV epidemic among men who have sex with men

Journal

SEXUAL HEALTH
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages 19-33

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/SH08081

Keywords

Australia; early treatment; HIV/AIDS; men who have sex with men; testing

Funding

  1. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
  2. University of New South Wales [DP0771620]
  3. Australian Research Council
  4. University Postgraduate Award from the University of New South Wales
  5. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [358425]
  6. National Institutes of Health, USA [1-U01-AI6994-01, 1-U01-AI068641, 1-U01-A1069907-01, 5-U19-AI05371]
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES [R37AI005371, U01AI068641, U01AI069907, R01AI005371] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: We address the research questions: (i) what proportion of new HIV infections is transmitted from people who are (a) undiagnosed, (b) in primary HIV infection (PHI), (c) on antiretroviral therapy?; and (ii) what is the expected epidemiological impact of (a) increasing the proportion of newly acquired HIV infections receiving early treatment, and (b) increasing HIV testing rates? Methods: We used a mathematical model to simulate HIV transmission in the population of men who have sex with men (MSM) in Australia. We calibrated the model using established biological and clinical data and a wide range of Australian MSM epidemiological and behavioural data sources. Results: We estimate that similar to 19% of all new HIV infections are transmitted from the similar to 3% of Australian HIV-infected MSM who are in PHI; similar to 31% of new HIV infections are estimated to be transmitted from the similar to 9% of MSM with undiagnosed HIV. We estimate that the average number of infections caused per HIV-infected MSM through the duration of PHI is similar to 0.14-0.28. Conclusions: The epidemiological impact of increasing treatment in PHI would be modest due to insufficient detection of newly-infected individuals. In contrast, increases in HIV testing rates could have substantial epidemiological consequences. The benefit of testing will also increase over time. Promoting increases in the coverage and frequency of testing for HIV could be a highly-effective public health intervention, but the population-level impact of interventions based on promoting early treatment of patients diagnosed in PHI is likely to be small. Treating PHI requires further evaluation of its long-term effects on HIV-infected individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available