4.4 Article

Application of High-Speed Counter-Current Chromatography Preparative Separation of Flavone C-Glycosides From Lophatherum gracile

Journal

SEPARATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 48, Issue 12, Pages 1906-1912

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/01496395.2012.762795

Keywords

flavone C-glycoside; Gramineae; High-speed counter-current chromatography; Lophatherum gracile

Funding

  1. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University [IRT0965]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81072535]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [8351063201000003]
  4. Science and Technology Development Fund of Macao Special Administrative Region [013/2008/A1]
  5. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou [2010U1-E00531-6]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preparative high-speed counter-current chromatography (HSCCC) was used to separate and purify bioactive constituents from the stems and leaves of Lophatherum gracile Brongn. Six flavone C-glycosides each at over 95% purity including two new compounds were obtained in one-step separation by HSCCC with an optimized two-phase solvent system composed of ethyl acetate-n-butanol-ethanol-water at volume ratio of 4:2:1.5:8.5 (v/v/v/v). The experiment yielded 19.9mg of luteolin 6-C--D-galactopyranosiduronic acid (12)--D-glucopyranoside (1), 28.5mg of luteolin 6-C--L-arabinopyranosyl-7-O--D-glucopyranoside (2), 31.5mg of isoorientin (3), 44.8mg of orientin (4), 25.3mg of swertiajaponin (5) and 12.1mg of apigenin 6-C--D-galactopyranosiduronic acid (12)--D-glucopyranoside (6) from 500mg of crude extracts. The purity of these compounds was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Their chemical structures were identified by electron spray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESI-MS), H-1 and C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available