4.7 Article

Use of the combined phase partitioning systems for recovery of proteases from hepatopancreas of Pacific white shrimp

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 57-63

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.03.025

Keywords

Three-phase partitioning system; Aqueous two-phase system; Back extraction; Pacific white shrimp; Protease; Hepatopancreas

Funding

  1. Higher Education Research Promotion
  2. Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recovery of proteases from hepatopancreas of Pacific white shrimp using three-phase partitioning (TPP) system in combination with aqueous two-phase system (ATPS) was investigated. TPP was performed using t-butanol with different crude protease extract (CPE)/t-butanol ratios. The interphase of system comprising CPE and t-butanol with a ratio of 1:1 in the presence of 30% ammonium sulphate yielded the highest purification fold (PF) (2.6-fold) with the recovery of 76.0%. Subsequently, TPP fraction was subjected to ATPS. Effects of phase compositions including PEG molecular weight (MW) and concentration as well as types and concentration of salts on partitioning of proteases were studied. ATPS comprising PEG1000 (15%, w/w) and magnesium sulphate (25%, w/w) provided the best condition for the maximal partitioning of proteases into the top phase and gave the highest PF (8.6-fold). The yield of 65.5% was obtained. ATPS fraction was further mixed with PEG8000 and several salts for back extraction (BE). BE using 25% PEG8000 and 10% MgSO4 gave the highest PF (9.9-fold) with the yield of 46.2%. Based on electrophoresis and activity staining, the fractionated proteases had the MW of 36 and 26 kDa. Therefore, the combined partitioning systems, TPP-ATPS-BE, could be effectively used to recover and purify proteases from hepatopancreas of Pacific white shrimp. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available