4.7 Article

Enhanced nitrification at short hydraulic retention time using a 3-stage biological aerated filter system incorporating an organic polishing reactor

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 136, Issue -, Pages 199-206

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.09.003

Keywords

Biological aerated filter; Organic polishing reactor; Nitrification; Hydraulic retention time; Nitrite accumulation

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science Technology (MEST)
  2. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) through the Human Resource Training Project for Regional Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a 3-stage biological aerated filter (BAF) system was proposed for the enhancement of nitrification at short hydraulic retention time (HRT). This was done by incorporating an intermittent aeration reactor, as an organic polishing reactor, into a conventional 2-stage pre-denitrification/nitrification BAF system. Laboratory experiments were performed at three different HRTs (i.e., 3, 2 and 1 h). Experimental results clearly showed that NH4-N removal of a conventional BAF system severely deteriorated in the presence of even a very small amount of organic matter at the short HRT of 1 h. Moreover, nitrite accumulation was observed at this HRT. This means that organic matter could be a limiting factor in nitrification at short HRTs. These problems were effectively controlled in the 3-stage BAF system. When the HRT of a conventional BAF system was reduced from 2 to I h, NH4-N removal decreased in from 96.6% to 74.0%. In contrast, for the experimental 3-stage BAF system, NH4-N removal remained high over 94% at the HRT of I h. This was because the polishing reactor eliminated organic matter before it could enter the nitrification reactor. Finally, this organic polishing reactor contributed to the higher removal of T-N and T-P. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available