4.7 Article

Simultaneous hydrogen sulphide and carbon dioxide removal from biogas by water-swollen reverse osmosis membrane

Journal

SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY
Volume 131, Issue -, Pages 108-116

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.041

Keywords

Agro-biogas upgrading; Biomethane; Water vapour; SEM and EDX analysis; Porosimetry; Carbon dioxide

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation [14-12695S]
  2. Technology Agency of the Czech Republic [TE01020080]
  3. Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports [LH-14006]
  4. Grant Fecundus - Research Fund for Coal and Steel of EC [RFCRCT-2010-00009]
  5. MSMT (Ministry for Education, Youth and Sport) [7C11009]
  6. MSMT [LD-13018]
  7. Italian National Program, Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Competitivita [PON01_01840]
  8. [P106/10/1194]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biogas is a suitable alternative fuel if unwanted impurities are removed to avoid corrosion of the inner parts of an engine. A recent breakthrough in biogas purification showed that a thin hydrophilic composite membrane can create the selective water swollen barrier able to remove unwanted sour gases such as carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulphide owing to significantly higher water solubility of the latter in comparison to methane. This work presents the use of water-swollen membranes for the simultaneous removal of carbon dioxide, hydrogen sulphide and water vapour from agro-biogas. Up to 82 vol.% of carbon dioxide and 77 vol.% of hydrogen sulphide were successfully removed from the feed stream at a pressure of 220 kPa. The selection of the most suitable thin hydrophilic composite membrane based on the knowledge of its basic characteristics is discussed. SEM analysis showed that the surface of the best performing composites changed significantly upon swelling by water. It was found that a compact structure of the upper selective thin layer after the swelling by water is fundamental for obtaining a selective water-swollen membrane. The next key factor is a high porosity of the membrane support. A detailed comparison of various systems and their performance is presented. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available