4.7 Article

Selective isolation of bacterial cells within a microfluidic device using magnetic probe-based cell fishing

Journal

SENSORS AND ACTUATORS B-CHEMICAL
Volume 195, Issue -, Pages 581-589

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2014.01.004

Keywords

Magnetic bacterial cell sorting; Microsystems; Magnetic in situ hybridization; Magnetic nanoparticle labeling

Funding

  1. Region Rhone-Alpes
  2. French National Research Agency [ANR-08-CESA-013-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper demonstrates the selective isolation of bacterial cells from a mixture by combining magnetic probe-based cell fishing with the use of microfluidics. A microfluidic cell sorter was obtained by integrating permanent micromagnets in a PDMS microchannel. While non-target cells pass through the device, the magnetically labeled target cells can be efficiently captured thanks to the high magnetic field gradients generated by the micro-flux sources. The sorting device capabilities were evaluated by performing enrichment of Escherichia coli DH10 beta from a bacterial cell mixture containing an initial concentration of 0.04% E. coli DH10 beta and 99.96% Acinetobacter sp. ADP1. The probes used to specifically target E. coli cells were RNA transcripts from PCR amplicons of 23S rRNA genes from E. coli DH10 beta DNA. Those probes were biotinylated to enable magnetic labeling with 50 nm streptavidin-coated superparamagnetic particles after in situ hybridization. qPCR analysis of the sorted fractions revealed that the target cells were enriched from an initial concentration of 0.04% to a final concentration of 98.46%, with a 50% recovery rate, at a throughput of 10(9) cells per hour. This approach offers great potential to address issues linked to exploration of bacterial diversity in complex ecosystems, where labeling strategies applicable to unculturable bacteria are required. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available